Friday, July 21, 2006

one bad guy, one good guy

you know, i find it disturbing the degree to which i'm still, after all these years, capable of being surprised by our goddamn cockbag of a president. seriously, shouldn't i have expected him to veto the stem cell bill? shouldn't i have expected that he would actively decide to do nothing to prevent another hurricane katrina? this jackass gets two chances in the course of his presidency to actually actively save thousands and thousands of lives and he fucking squanders them both. but really, let's thank god that, while thousands of people who are actually people are getting killed in iraq for no reason, we're saving the lives of hundreds of masses of cells that never would have been people anyway.

and then. and THEN. he goes and speaks to the NAACP, after turning them down five years in a row. are you kidding me? and then this asshat gets up there and invokes LINCOLN. lincoln's gotta be spinning in his grave after this one. and then he lets loose with this gem: "I come from a family committed to civil rights. My faith tells me that we are all children of God — equally loved, equally cherished, equally entitled to the rights He grants us all."

in what way has anyone in the bush family ever demonstrated a commitment to civil rights? and while we're at it, equally entitled to rights? hmm. someone should ask him how this applies to, i don't know, gay marriage. or the right to expect that, if your city gets flooded, someone will come help you. or the right to vote without being misled, mistreated, or otherwise disenfranchised. idiot!

and now for a much more pleasant subject. for the boy who has been ever-so-patiently waiting for a blog mention: here it is! consider yourself mentioned! i know it's not much, but let's call it the first pancake of blog mentions. and, you're cute. the end!

10 Comments:

At 11:45 AM, Blogger Chris said...

You're totally right about the value of life argument -- saving thousands of folks in the army who already have lives back home, vs the potential for lives... sigh.

How's Moby Dick?

 
At 11:57 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Stef! I thought the same thing yesterday when I read about the stem cell research veto. I mean I guess I instinctively give everyone credit for being slightly intelligent, even when I should know better. Of course he only gives a shit about lives when they directly affect him either b/c they are close to him or they affect his money and investments. So basically white Christians. ARGH the US is going to fall so fucking far behind other countries in terms of science education and research with people like this making key decisions.

BTW - I think cute boy needs to post a comment one of these days...

 
At 12:09 PM, Blogger Nelson said...

There is plenty of evidence thast the Bush family has been a champion of civil rights. That is, if by "civil" you mean "oil" and by "rights" you mean "companies.

 
At 1:06 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I never could understand why the NAACP was so eager to get him to speak... I guess I imagined something like "Amateur Night" on "Showtime at the Apollo" where they'd boo him off the stage. Hopefully, we only have to endure this nonsense a little while longer. But I have confidence that Mr. Bush believes in equal protection under the law*.

I'm so honored for the mention. I'm trying not to let it go to my head... you're going to have to keep my ego in check. Now, if only I could stop thinking about you and get back to work...

* equal protection void in Iraq, blue states, Guantanamo Bay, and does not extend to non-Whites, non-Christians or gays. All rights reserved.

 
At 1:11 PM, Blogger stefanie said...

see? i TOLD you he was cute.

 
At 1:23 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Awwww, I LOVE cute boy! Can we clone him or does he have a twin ;)

 
At 5:57 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Heaven forbid you should allow gays to marry. I mean, the whole unity through love and devotion. How in the world can a same sex couple marry? I find it completely rational to deny two people who care, love and are happy with one another the ability to officially announce their unity through marriage. I completely think America is unready to accept it.

My recommendation: Go to the bomb shelter, put your head in the sand, duck and cover under a desk, anything.... Just don't change your values.

Oh... and especially make sure you blur the lines between church and state as often as possible.

 
At 11:12 PM, Blogger stefanie said...

dude, sam, your argument doesn't really make sense to me at all. i mean, it's true that interracial marriage was illegal in the US until what, the 60s? but we see now that that was wrong, and shouldn't that make us less likely to let something so discriminatory happen again? i mean, the arguments against gay marriage are the same as the arguments against interracial marriage - unnatural, god wouldn't like it, etc. but with that in our history, why isn't our reaction, "never again?"

and yeah, bush didn't invent being against gay marriage. but did lincoln say, "ah well, everyone before me has been against slavery, so i guess i will be too"? we elect these people to lead, and leading means doing things that you know are morally right even if they're politically unpopular. what would have happened if lincoln had waited around until america was "ready" for slavery to be abolished? i won't say it never would have happened, but it would have been years and years and years.

and besides, what the fuck is there to be "ready" for? why does america need to be "ready" for gay marriage? what the hell difference does it make to the average straight couple whether gay couples get married? think about it. what business is it of mine to be "ready" for that?

 
At 8:09 AM, Blogger stefanie said...

okay, why are we getting so nasty about this, sam? i wasn't trying to "confront" or "attack" or "ridicule" you, and all of your namecalling is completely unnecessary. i seriously can't believe you think you're being attacked, yet you managed to call me (and anonymous) foolish, ignorant, stupid, idealistic, and deluded. (you also implied that i am a selective reader, and that hurts.) nice. i was simply trying to have a discussion; thanks for completely overreacting. if you feel so mistreated, feel free to take your ball and go home. seriously.

one thing first: 1) of course i know i can't compare bush to lincoln. that's my entire damn point. some people are good leaders who are willing to make unpopular yet morally correct decisions (lincoln), and some aren't (bush).

 
At 12:44 AM, Blogger stefanie said...

okay, i'm not sure why i feel compelled to continue this argument, but here goes. the anonymous poster is actually a friend of mine, by the way, and someone you don't know, so what's the difference whether he used his real name or not? "cowardly" seems like a real stretch here.

the thing is, anonymous is exactly right, and very astutely points out that, despite your assertion to the contrary, your thought process (americans aren't ready, change is slow) is extremely conservative. he was just pointing out that it's a bogus argument. it's the job of a good leader to change public opinion, to encourage citizens to be more open-minded, to fight discrimination.

and, by the way, change is NOT slow. in only five years since 9/11, bush has managed to convince us that it's okay to tap the phones of US citizens without a warrant, and that it's okay to hold potentially innocent people in detention centers indefinitely with no trials, and that it's okay to torture them while we're holding them. since bush took office, only 5.5 years ago, this country has become almost unrecognizable to me. change is only slow when it's change our leadership doesn't really care about.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

f